Thinking outside the idiot box

It was thought out and well written. When we watch TV it does make us smarter just how Johnson says. If Allemang was an above-average critic, then Doyle is well on his way to being one of the most important TV columnists Canada has ever produced.

But television, particularly Canadian television, has never really had that one important critic. In my opinion not all television is good television. It means that someone is looking at television as a cultural force, that someone is looking deeper at the medium that most closely mirrors our society.

Also, I believe it is only logical to be able to have freedom to choose what shows we watch. Indeed, most TV critics at Canadian dailies do their jobs well: The evidence given by Dana Stevens was very compelling. They also resisted the temptation to slam it just because it was a remake.

Personally, I believe that both Dana Stevens and Steven Johnson were correct in their analysis of television. In my knowledge of television I learn stuff that could some day safe my life.

This format, in addition to allowing him to discuss several shows each day, gives him the opportunity to write about a TV-related issue like the election and still have space to squeeze in a proper review. They spread across the room like soapsuds in an episode of I Love Lucy where Lucy floods the house while trying to do the laundry.

While Allemang said a few weeks before that the tapes were destined for a Dumpster, Doyle found them here when he arrived to claim his new office. This is something that is always going to be with me for the rest of my life because of television. Good, but not great. The typical formula is to review one show per column, spending the majority of the column describing the show, and at the end deliver the verdict.

In my opinion I believe Johnson is right. Again, while not glowing, reviews were fair. But how is he going to clear all these tapes out of here by 5 p. For Doyle, television is more than the idiot box, where the lowest common denominator can gawk at hokey reality programs or insipid sitcoms.

If television is the most truly vital and culturally significant of all media, why is it so hard to find truly vital and significant writing about it?

I learned that if you are bitten by a poisonous creature to suck the venom out of the area that was bitten as soon as possible, and spit it out, to also capture the creature; if possible, in order for the doctors to know which antidote to use.

Dana Stevens takes it a step further and emphasizes that normal Americans do not think of the lessons they have just learned after watching a TV-show, they simply think about the next episode and what excitement that will hold for them.Your Amazon Music account is currently associated with a different marketplace.

Summary: Thinking Outside the Idiot Box

To enjoy Prime Music, go to Your Music Library and transfer your account to (US). I think this article argues against Johnson’s claim that there are many different ways one can get smarter by watching TV, or one can make smart decisions based off watching TV.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged.

"Thinking outside the box puzzle" Through the argument “Thinking Outside the Idiot Box” by Dana Stevens, I agree that watching TV dose not makes us smarter because “the medium (of those who like watch a lot of TV) seems neither like a brain-liquefying poison nor a salutary tonic”(Stevens ).

Kartik Prabhakar. Prof. Corey Williams. English A.

Thinking Outside the Idiot Box

10 November Thinking Outside the Idiot Box. In this essay Dana Stevens, the author, has written on an article she recently read about how TV makes the watcher smarter, and questions the article.

Response to “Thinking Outside the Idiot Box” by Dana Stevens

Feb 21,  · In the two articles “Watching TV makes you smarter” written by Steven Johnson, and “Thinking outside the idiot box” by Dana Stevens, the two authors have different views on the matter.

Johnson talks about how shows like “24” and “The Sopranos” which makes you smarter by their intellectual setting. Apr 25,  · 24 is the perfect example of a TV show that challenges its audience's cognitive faculties with intricate plotlines and rapid-fire information while actively discouraging them from thinking too much about the vigilante ethic it portrays.

Thinking outside the idiot box
Rated 5/5 based on 88 review